Subtlety, minimal resolutions, the value of the mystic, FromSoft, David Lynch and root polytopes

First, let me praise another excellent talk by Ayah Almousa; she presented newest work with my friend Anton Dochterman as well as Ben Smith on triangulations of root polytopes and the applications to minimal resolutions. Recall: A free resolution is a way to write a module M as a Matryoshka doll of free modules, that is, as an exact sequence

0 \rightarrow F_i \rightarrow F_{i-1} \rightarrow \cdots \rightarrow F_{1} \rightarrow M \rightarrow 0

where the F_i are free (that is, as simple as you could ever want). And whoever tried to ever studies something hard knows how valuable it is to write something in simpler terms. A minimal free resolution is just that, and a root polytope is a polytope whose vertices correspond to the root directions of a Coxeter group. Ayah surveyed how triangulations of the latter are related to resolutions of monomial ideals, and applied this to prove some new results as well as give more insightful proofs to previously known ones. Bravo, Ayah, Anton and Ben! Here is her talk.

Now to more serious business. Real serious.

Overall maidenless behaviour
Continue reading

Kustin-Miller unprojection, degree maps and post-nuclear relationships of the future

Dear Diary,

yesterday I heard an amazing talk by Eva Philippe and I will get back to that, as well as related questions I am thinking about with Sergey Avvakumov (who is on the market btw., though I do not expect trouble there cause he is doing great things) and Mark Berezovik (who I got to Jerusalem to finish his masters in exile. Study in exile. Interesting that we do that again).


Anyway, dear diary, it reminded me of something many years in the future.

You see, in 35 years I am going to sit my second grandchild on my lap. The bright one. She was always the bright one. So many questions.

And so, after helping my first, my grandson, build a gauntlet for the mutated squirrel warriors, I will sit her down. Spit the iodine tablet into the bucket and sigh, thinking about the best advice. She is starting to get interested in relationships, and she is asking me.

“Grandpa, I want to ask about pairings”

she begins, and my bioengineered squidheart sinks. Not that one.

Continue reading

The Medici bitch and quantifications in commutative algebra

As forces and probabilities greater than I decide my location in the next 48 hours, let me briefly profess my love for Samantha Morton as Serpent Queen. It is beautiful to watch a sly smile creep across her lips as schemes come to fruition, and perhaps more importantly, how hardships are quickly incorporated into yet another scheme.

Isn’t it nice to scheme in France. Muhahaha

Indeed, isn’t it most interesting when things fail? When we invariably hit our nose, the rock rolls down the hill again. For we can scheme how to roll it up next time. Blood in the streets and all that.

Continue reading

Sofia, Lefschetz via shelling and bonk and the holy trinity (kind of) (part 1)

This is born out of an attempt to find equivariant Lefschetz elements, so to have a combinatorial Lefschetz theorem that is a little less generic for some conjectures in geometric topology. Actually this succeeds to give some interesting results, and I will update in a second part. It will take me some days, in the meantime I made this here simple and clear.

Dear X,

so, Covid seems almost over (fingers crossed). I lost three I loved during the time (none of them due to covid, funny enough; two suicides and a heart failure), I had covid twice (fingers crossed for the hat trick) despite three vaccinations. I am in Sofia, at a inaugural conference of the ICMS.

But that’s not what this post is about. This post is about another proof of the g-conjecture. Well, the Lefschetz property for simplicial cycles, really. It is the simplest one yet, but that is not why it is important. It is also the third one (that is essentially different) and combines the ideas of three teams. (I count the original one by me here, and the characteristic two proof by Papadakis and Petrotou; our joint paper is a combination of the ideas from the former and yada yada yada creative counting to make the holy number work out. Deal with it.) If the first is a refined choreography of slashes and parries that is difficult to follow, and the second the equivalent of wooshing around with bloodhound step (using a miraculous formula that comes out of nowhere), then this is the equivalent of bonking the boss with a hammer: we write down a rational function and examine it, observing it has a pole to show it is nontrivial. Unfortunately it seems to be less general than either of the previous proofs, but I will see whether it can be pushed.

Continue reading

Degrees, curious identities, Lefschetz maps and biased pairings (and a cliffhanger)

This post is long overdue, but being in the middle of nowhere helps finally progressing a little.

In the last post, I discussed a lemma of Kronecker. Let me discuss another version

Lemma (Kronecker, second version) Consider A, B linear maps from a vectorspace X to another one Y over any infinite field. Assume that im(A) and B ker(A) intersect trivially. Then the generic linear combination of A and B has kernel equal to the intersection of kernels of A and B, in other words, the kernel is as small as possible.

This is a very powerful tool to construct high-rank maps in vector spaces, in particular in the case when X and Y are dual in a Poincaré duality algebra. Then im A and ker A are orthogonal complements, and linear algebra tells us that orthogonal complements intersect trivially if and only if the Poincaré pairing does not degenerate on either space. This is exploited in my proof of the g-conjecture to construct Lefschetz elements, see here, and also in this survey (which I was invited to for winning the EMS prize, which I still cannot quite believe).

Continue reading